"The Voters - Promoting a Peaceful Political Evolution as a Focus for Dissent"  
  Login / Register
Economic Democracy
National Referendum & Write-in Voting

Economic Democracy

The recent Building a New World Conference held in Radford, Virginia attracted a galaxy of leading lights in the progressive movement to discuss the war on terrorism, the erosion of American’s freedoms, and other critical issues. The most impressive presenters were several individuals who shared the clearest view of the economy and its future and who provided the most realistic vision to avoid its complete collapse and how to achieve true economic democracy.

Mike Whitney is a prolific web journalist whose work is regularly featured on Counterpunch as well as other leading Internet sites. Here are some of his articles in just the last couple of weeks:

Getting to the Heart of America’s Economic Crisis: An Interview with Michael Hudson

Swan Song for Fanny Mae: Eulogy for the Ownership Society

Visualizing Dow 6,000: The Road to Perdition

Bad News and Bank Runs: A Shock to the Collective Psyche

Apocalypse Down Under: Will the Fall of an Aussie Bank Rock Wall Street?

Hunkering Down in Afghanistan: Make Way for Field Marshall Obama

The Democrats are the Real Problem: Reality Check

Richard C. Cook is a former federal government analyst, whistleblower, leading scholar of monetary theory and economic reform, and author of “Challenger Revealed: An Insider’s Account of How the Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age.” His new book, We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform, is scheduled for release in the fall of 2008 by Tendril Press. His recent articles include:

The End of the Anglo-American Empire?

Will We See the End of Empire in Our Time?

Status Report on the Collapse of the U.S. Economy

The Basic Income Guarantee and Monetary Reform: A Tale of Two Ideas

Ellen Hodgson Brown is a California attorney and author of eleven books, the most recent of which is The Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free. Her recent articles include:

The Secret Bailout of J. P. Morgan: How Insider Trading Looted Bear Stearns and the American Taxpayer

The Subprime Trump Card: Standing up to the Banks

Let the Lawsuits Begin: Banks Brace for a Storm of Litigation

Putting the "Federal" Back in the Federal Reserve

Steven Shafarman is the founder and president of Citizen Policies Advocates and a member of the coordinating committee of the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network. He is the author of five books, the most recent of which is Peaceful, Positive Revolution: Economic Security for Every American.

Posted by administrator on Sunday, August 03 @ 12:50:53 MST
(Read More... | Score: 0)
Concentration Camps in America
Articles          February 18, 2008 by Online Journal

               Concentration Camps in America: The Consequences of 40 Years of Fear

 

            If you type the phrase “concentration camps” into your Internet search engine, you will find page after page of references to martial law and the construction of concentration camps in the United States on behalf of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

 

            A close examination reveals that many of these references lack sufficient facts to support their conclusions; however, taken as a whole, there is an abundance of factual information showing an alarming trend in the deployment of federal and military forces to restrain and detain American citizens.

 

            Among the Internet sites are those listing between 600 and 800 locations in the United States where the government is establishing “concentration camps.”  Many of these are former or active military bases; however, several provide detailed information about their location and improvements, including maps, videos, and satellite photographs:

 

  A former Amtrak facility located in Beech Grove, Indiana, is featured in a widely-viewed video on utube.  From the audio description and video images, it is easy to imagine that the site could be used as a detention facility; however, a telephone call to the desk officer of the Beech Grove Police Department reveals that much of the evidence, including helicopter landing facilities and radio towers, actually belong to the police department that is located adjacent to the now largely abandoned facility.  The desk officer, who also happens to be a local city councilman, was unaware of any federal involvement at the location.  “It’s a straight facility,” he said.

 

  There are a number of photographs depicting a site in northern Michigan with a double row of chainlink fencing topped with barb wire and elevated guard towers.  The area is part of Camp Grayling, the largest installation of the Michigan National Guard, which deploys several military police commands and trains more than 100 law enforcement agencies from Northern Michigan.  The photographs clearly show an outdoor detention facility, and recent comments by an undercover observer confirm that it is currently maintained.  However, there is an e-mail on the Internet dated January 20, 1999 from a base Deputy Public Affairs Officer who said:  “The ‘camps’ you are referring to are used by our Military Police for training.  One of their war-time missions is to process and care for prisoners of war (POWs).  The photos you saw are of that training site.”

 

  Perhaps the most disturbing images show a Department of Homeland facility known as Swift Luck Green located in Central Wyoming.  The five satellite photographs are labeled as having been taken on January 23 and March 24, 2006 by DigitalGlobe and are annotated as “DHS Facility (SLG).”  Labels include: prisoner housing, restaurant for DHS personnel; 3-story dormitory for prisoners; guard towers; and prison cells.  Various blogs further identify the location as a closed coal mine near Hanna, Wyoming in Carbon County.

 

            There is nothing comparable to the photographs visible on GoogleEarth at the listed coordinates, and desk officers at the local sheriff’s office and the police department are unaware of any local DHS or FEMA facilities.  An e-mail to DigitalGlobe’s media relations contact about the photographs received this reply: “they were in a report called ‘the hidden gulag,’ a report on secret nk [North Korean] prison camps.”  The report and original photographs can be viewed at the U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea’s website, www.hrnk.org.

 

            This is what fear has wrought.  First, our own government has done everything in its power to make us fearful so we will support its illegal and unconstitutional activities, and then in our fear, we have come to distrust everything our government says and does – for good reason. 

Posted by administrator on Monday, February 18 @ 17:04:01 MST
(Read More... | 34878 bytes more | Score: 0)
The Iraq War Trial
Articles

OpEdNews.com December 5, 2007

The Iraq War Trial

As an independent, I have often thought that it would be more fun to attend a Democratic party, rather than one thrown by Republicans. I believed Democrats were more "progressive," creative, more willing to act out, but I’m no longer so sure.

Even though voters provided the Democrats with a majority in Congress in the last election, the Democrats have continued politics as usual. Impeachment’s off the table, continue to fund the most idiotic war in history, approve an Attorney General who don’t know his torture from a hole in the ground, etc, etc, etc.

Politically, I’ve withdrawn from both parties because it doesn’t appear that either one really represents me and the vast majority of ordinary voters in this country, and I’m convinced that they’ve both sold out to the same corporate interests, including the defense industry. Which brings me to the subject.

The Democrats are so afraid of being labeled as wimps by the Republicans that they’re afraid to take a risk. Even though they now chair and have a majority in every committee in Congress, they continue to dither away every opportunity to take the political lead and to actually do what they were elected to do: STOP THIS STUPID WAR!!!

As a trial lawyer, I was often required to litigate cases I wished were better, but I always knew that my opponents’ cases were weaker than they appeared, and if I maximized my strengths and exploited their weaknesses, there was always a chance of victory. At least, that’s what trials are all about. My job was to investigate the matter, gather my evidence, learn the law, and line up my witnesses.

We lawyers are trained to put on a good show and, even if the judge sometimes acts like another lawyer for the other side, we can still parade our witnesses and trust that the jury has some commonsense. We just have to lay out our evidence, challenge the other side, and argue the facts and law. Mostly, you have to have the courage, day after day, to walk into court, pick a jury and roll the dice. Timid attorneys never leave their offices; they settle their cases and compromise their clients’ interests. They practice the way congressional democrats have been acting.

Democrats should recognize that their case is far stronger than they think, and that the Republican case is far weaker. It’s just that the Republicans hang together and tend to be bullies. But, nobody likes bullies and that’s a good place to start. Stand up to a bully, punch him in the nose, and he’ll run home, crying. The biggest little bully on the Capitol block likes to dress up in the uniform he once disgraced by refusing to fight and by going AWOL, and to strut around as though he was something more than a mama’s boy who has never personally accomplished anything without his daddy’s help.

Posted by administrator on Wednesday, December 05 @ 16:53:50 MST
(Read More... | 16479 bytes more | Score: 0)
: A Brief on the Use of Water Torture by American Officials in the War on Terroris
Articles

OpEdNews.com November 2, 2007

United States Senate - Committee on the Judiciary

In the Matter of the Nomination of Michael B. Mukasey to be Attorney General of the United States of America

A Brief on the Use of Water Torture by American Officials in the War on Terrorism

WHEREAS President George W. Bush has nominated Michael B. Mukasey to serve as the Attorney General of the United States, a cabinet position established by law, and has requested the advice and consent of the United States Senate to the appointment pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America ; and

WHEREAS the Committee on the Judiciary is preparing to vote on the nomination; and

WHEREAS the nominee was asked by members of the Committee whether the use of "waterboarding," an interrogation technique that simulates drowning, by American officials on prisoners taken into custody in the war on terrorism amounts to torture; and

WHEREAS the nominee has stated that his legal opinion on waterboarding would depend on the facts and circumstances of the program and that he has not been briefed on the government’s program and techniques;

THEREFORE the following brief is submitted for his enlightenment and for such other use as the Committee may find appropriate.

DESCRIPTION OF WATER TORTURE

During water torture, the body and head of a victim are typically strapped to an inclined board with the head lower than the feet. The victim’s jaws are forced open and a cloth is forced deep into the mouth and over the nose. Water is continuously poured over and into the cloth forcing the victim to stop breathing until forced to either swallow water and/or aspirate it into the lungs, triggering the gag reflex.

Water torture results in controlled drowning, the degree of which depends upon the ability of an individual to resist and the will of the torturer. The punishment ranges from psychological torment and physical suffocation to death. At the least, water torture represents a mock execution. The primeval fear of asphyxiation leads to overwhelming panic in even the most disciplined individuals who may be trained and psychologically conditioned to die rather than submit.

Water torture can lead to serious injury to the victim. A lack of oxygen can quickly result in permanent brain damage, and the aspiration of even small amounts of water can lead to lung disease, including pneumonia. Struggles by the victim against the restraints can produce severe sprains and broken bones. Significantly, the intense fear of imminent death and the victim’s helplessness to prevent it produces devastating and long lasting psychological damage.

Posted by administrator on Friday, November 02 @ 19:42:59 MST
(Read More... | 14229 bytes more | | Score: 0)
War Without Win: A White Paper On Iran
ArticlesMedia Monitors Networks March 12, 2007


The ancient Greek name for Iran was Persis, which was usually spoken with fear – for good reason. At the beginning of the Fifth Century BC, the Persian Empire under Darius the Great was the most threatening force on Earth and was poised to conquer the democratic city states of Greece and, perhaps, the embryonic Roman republic beyond. But for a series of unfortunate events (for the Persians) modern study of the classics would be concentrated on the Persian language, history and literature, rather than upon Greek and Latin.


Iran, the last remnant of the Persian Empire, is presently threatened by the greatest super power in history – the Unites States of America. The conclusion of this article is that, rather than attack, the United States should immediately reestablish diplomatic relations with Iran, negotiate unconditionally, and ensure its protection from armed attack by Israel or any other nation under a comprehensive policy that seeks to avoid the expansion of nuclear weapons to Iran and all other nations and to disarm all nations within ten years. To arrive at this solution, we and those who purport to lead us must appreciate the history of the Iranian people and have a clear understanding of the facts leading to this crisis.

Posted by administrator on Thursday, March 15 @ 09:33:51 MST
(Read More... | 45054 bytes more | Score: 0)
MAKE SCHOLARS – NOT WAR
Articles Op Ed News - Febuary 7, 2007

MAKE SCHOLARS – NOT WAR

If you are planning for a year, sow rice; if you are planning for a decade, plant trees; if you are planning for a lifetime, educate people. ~Chinese proverb

When President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on January 8, 2002, he imposed unattainable federal mandates on local public schools; however, he has failed to provide the leadership and resources required to give them any chance of meeting the standards.

In 2004 (the last year for which full statistics are available), we spent $462.7 billion to educate our children. Local school districts raised 43.9 percent of their budgets, the states contributed 47.1 percent, and the federal government chipped in $41.3 billion, or less than nine percent.

A broad disparity of education funding continues to exist. The amount of money available to educate children depends, not only on the wealth of their families and the communities in which they live, but upon the priorities established by our elected local, state and federal representatives. Nationally, we spent an average of $8,287 per child in 2004; however, the range was from $5,008 in Utah to $12,981 in New Jersey.

On the fifth anniversary of its signing, NCLB remains underfunded by billions of dollars; its objectives are still focused on “teaching to the test;” it continues to unfairly punish public schools and their hard-working and dedicated teachers; and it deprives our most needy children of a meaningful opportunity to obtain the education they need to survive in a society in which knowledge is the key to success.

Almost 70 percent of professional educators rate NCLB as a failure, primarily because its emphasis on testing deprives students, particularly the most disadvantaged, of a meaningful education that includes social studies, foreign languages, the arts and music. This poor grade is also assigned by 60 percent of all Americans, who either believe the Act has had no effect on schools or has had a negative effect.

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as currently defined by NCLB, is scheduled for reauthorization this year. Congress is required to act, and we can only hope it acts wisely. Our representatives must accept the truth, reject the false, and choose a path leading to success and away from failure.

It is true that the education of our children is and should remain one of the most important tasks of our federal government. Indeed, our society can never achieve its inherent potential, and it will never have the collective strength to be all it can be, until every child has equal access to nutrition, health care, and education.

Posted by administrator on Wednesday, February 07 @ 22:34:51 MST
(Read More... | 12389 bytes more | Score: 0)
ONE HEALTH CARE POLICY – INDIVISIBLE – WITH BENEFITS FOR ALL
ArticlesOp Ed News - January 29, 2007

ONE HEALTH CARE POLICY – INDIVISIBLE – WITH BENEFITS FOR ALL

“The poorest man would not part with health for money, but the richest would gladly part with all their money for health.” ~ Charles Caleb Colton (1780-1832)

President Bush likes to brag that he pays no attention to public opinion polls and that he doesn’t read the newspapers, so he may have been unaware that at least 72% of Americans favor government guaranteed health care. However, the November elections must have sent a message that the mood of the electorate has shifted, and that perhaps he should mention the health care crisis during his State of the Union Address. However, what President Bush actually said was yet another feeble attempt to reconcile the demands of his neocon controllers with the desperate needs of those he pretends to care about, but for whom he is incapable of empathy.

Bush started off with a good sound bite, “A future of hope and opportunity requires that all of our citizens have affordable and available health care.” (Applause.) He then proposed a $15,000 tax deduction for families whose employers provide health insurance or who purchase their own insurance. He also offered federal funds to states to help them make “basic health insurance available to all of their citizens.” Sounds good, but what’s up?

In a radio address three days earlier, Bush had criticized workers who have been “encouraged” to “choose overly expensive, gold-plated plans.” He said he wanted to “fix” the problem by increasing taxes on these “unwise” health plans that cost more than the proposed standard deduction. It doesn’t sound like he wants all of us to have the quality of health care his family wealth has ensured him throughout his life, or that we, the taxpayers, are providing him while he lives, rent-free, in our White House. Noooo. He’s talking real basic health care here – co-pays, high deductibles and limited coverage.

Let’s see, the minimum wage is now $5.15 an hour and Bush opposes any increase, so that’s $206 per week, or $10,712 per year (before taxes). Assuming a two-income family and a $15,000 deduction, Bush wants them to purchase “available health care” by using the taxes saved by the deduction. Does he really think that low-income workers can buy their own insurance with what they have left over after securing shelter, food, clothing, transportation and other essentials for their family? Or is he just flapping his lips, mouthing the words rolling down the Teleprompter?

Posted by administrator on Monday, January 29 @ 15:00:01 MST
(Read More... | 12730 bytes more | Score: 0)
A JUST AND FAIR TAX
ArticlesOp Ed News - January 24, 2007

A JUST AND FAIR TAX

“When there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” ~Plato (427 BC - 347 BC), The Republic

The United States government is primarily funded by a tax upon the income of all individuals, businesses and corporations. It is a crime to evade the payment of lawful taxes, random audits are used to keep us honest, and the tax is automatically deducted from most of our paychecks; however, the federal income tax primarily depends upon voluntary compliance with the law, particularly self reporting.

Most of us want to believe that the income tax system is fair and equitable; otherwise we would not tolerate it. Once we lose faith in the fairness of the system, widespread cheating becomes the norm, and once our tax system becomes entirely confiscatory for working taxpayers, violent revolution cannot be far behind.

The Present System of Taxation is Unfair To The Average American. When Eisenhower was president, corporations paid approximately a quarter of all federal taxes. Now they only pay about 10 percent.

In 1995, 275 corporations having assets of over $250 million avoided all taxes. Between 1996 and 1998, 50 of our largest corporations received over $55 billion in tax breaks and paid no federal taxes, presumably because they had no “income.”

In the 2004 “corporate tax reform bill,” 275 large companies and special interest groups were given $140 billion in tax breaks, instead of having their tax loop holes closed.

Posted by administrator on Tuesday, January 23 @ 11:33:46 MST
(Read More... | 12779 bytes more | Score: 0)
Hitler’s Bulge – Bush’s Surge
ArticlesOp Ed News - January 15, 2007

Hitler’s Bulge – Bush’s Surge

In the November 1932 elections, Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Party lost 34 seats in the Reichstag, leaving the Nazis in the minority with the support of only one-third of the voters. However, after frantic political maneuvering and threats of riots, the interim government failed and Hitler was appointed Chancellor on January 31, 1933. Hitler said, “I would like to thank Providence and the Almighty for choosing me of all people to wage this battle for Germany.”

In the November 2000 presidential election, more than a half million Americans cast their vote for Al Gore than for George W. Bush; however, irrespective of the popular vote, a candidate has to have a majority in the Electoral College to win. Although Gore was ahead by 20 electoral votes, Bush was ahead by 327 popular votes in Florida, and Bush needed Florida’s 25 electoral votes to overtake Gore. Fortunately, Bush’s brother was the governor of Florida and his state campaign manager was the Secretary of State. Gore filed a lawsuit to compel a manual recount in the four counties where he enjoyed the greatest support, and the Florida Supreme Court agreed to a partial recount to determine the “intent of the voters.” However, Bush appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court where a majority, appointed by Presidents Reagan and Bush Sr., overruled the Florida justices, denied a recount, and appointed Bush as president over the wishes of a majority of the American people. Bush said, “I trust God speaks through me and without that, I couldn’t do my job.”

On February 27, 1933, a leader of Hitler’s S.A. movement led a squad of storm troopers through a tunnel from Goering’s palace into the Reichstag building and set a fire that destroyed the building. The Nazis immediately arrested a retarded Dutch communist, blamed him for setting the fire, and started a wholesale roundup of political opponents. The next day a decree was issued suspending those sections of the constitution that guaranteed individual and civil liberties. Even though the Nazis commenced a massive propaganda campaign, and a majority again voted against him in new elections held in March, Hitler pushed through an “enabling act” granting him exclusive legislative power for four years. Two years later the Prussian Supreme Court ruled that the Gestapo was not subject to judicial review and that, “As long as the police carries out the will of the leadership, it is acting legally.”

Posted by administrator on Tuesday, January 16 @ 11:30:11 MST
(Read More... | 15168 bytes more | Score: 0)
ENERGY FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
ArticlesOp Ed News - May 11, 2006

ENERGY FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM

“The Universe, as far as we can observe it, is a wonderful and immense engine.“

~George Santayana

Americans face an economic and ecological disaster. We have become dependent upon petroleum, a finite energy source near its peak, and upon a supply system manipulated and controlled by foreign powers, whose interests are often hostile to ours. Moreover, we have elected an administration that is dominated by the oil companies, who devastate the environment without care, make obscene profits without guilt, and control our domestic and foreign policies for their own benefit and to our detriment.

Isn’t our national security just as dependent upon the availability of energy as upon a strong military? What can we do to protect ourselves and ensure the survival of our society?

An Imaginative Solution

Envision the amazing initiatives we could embark upon if our national energy policy and research was freed from the control of the oil companies and their political puppets.

Imagine that the Interstate Highway System and most major streets and highways in America were improved to provide a constant source of electro-magnetic energy sufficient to power a standard automobile, with comfortable seating for five adults, anywhere in America at no cost to the operator.

Imagine the introduction of triple-hybrid cars designed to operate primarily on electro-magnetic energy supplied through the surface of all highways and freeways, and which are equipped with small fuel efficient internal combustion engines to supplement rechargeable batteries for trips on local streets and byways.

Imagine we could travel for free throughout the United States as a matter of national privilege. We could get to our jobs without having to work for an hour each day just to pay the way. We would have more money to spend on vacations, and we would be able to tour this great nation, see the grand sights, and visit with our friends and relatives along the way.

Imagine the boon to tourism if foreign visitors could rent a car at the airport and drive around our great country for free, spending their excess cash at our small businesses along the way.

Is this a realistic dream? If we decided to provide free power on our highways as a matter of public policy, where would we obtain the energy?

Posted by administrator on Friday, May 12 @ 10:26:37 MST
(Read More... | 6669 bytes more | Score: 0)
This George Is No Washington
ArticlesMedia Monitors - April 11, 2006

Each was elected president of the United States, but George the 43 rd possesses none of the courage, intelligence, or wisdom of the first.

George Washington was born into a respectable planting family in Virginia. His father died when he was 11, leaving a widow and seven children. The young Washington received a grade-school education; however, he was unable to attend college. He had to go to work at age 16 as a surveyor and ultimately conducted more than 190 surveys on the Virginia frontier. When Washington was 20 years old, he petitioned the governor for a military appointment, and began to lead a series of military expeditions into the Ohio Country, where he engaged in battles with the French and their Indian allies. He was ultimately appointed a colonel, and in 1755 he became an aide-de-camp to the British General Braddock, who was leading an invasion into the French-held Ohio region. Braddock was killed and his army defeated during an Indian ambush; however, Washington was able to rally the troops and saved the lives of many soldiers. Two horses were shot out from under him, and four bullets pierced his coat as he maneuvered in the thick of the battle.

Only 23 years of age, Washington was appointed as Commander in Chief of the Virginia Regiment. He learned lessons from Braddock’s defeat and trained his troops in both the rigorous discipline of British troops and the “bushfighting” tactics of Indian warriors. For the next three and a half years, he led his thousand “Blues” in constant combat operations on the Virginia frontier in the war against France. He knew most of his soldiers personally and was viewed as a father figure, even though most of the soldiers were older than him. He resigned his commission in 1758 to get married and to attend to his family’s estate.

George W. Bush was born to high privilege; his great-grandfathers helped establish and earned enormous profits from the military industrial complex and, his grandfather helped finance Hitler’s war machine. His parents were both raised in wealthy households attended by servants, and they spoiled George Jr., their first born. He was allowed to abuse his siblings, to torment and kill animals and to sustain mediocrity in his education. He required his father’s “legacy” to get into Yale, where he organized physical hazing described in newspaper reports as “degrading, sadistic and obscene.” He was arrested for theft, disorderly conduct, drunk driving and possession of cocaine.

In 1968, 296,406 American boys were drafted into military service, and 6,332 came home from Vietnam in body bags. Although he was 22 years old, a college graduate, and physically fit, Bush’s father pulled strings to jump him over 500 waiting applicants and into the Texas Air National Guard, even though he could only answer 25 of the 100 questions on the pilot aptitude test. Bush declined to volunteer for Vietnam service, choosing instead to patrol the skies over Houston, Texas on weekends, until he grew bored and went AWOL.

Posted by administrator on Tuesday, April 11 @ 11:45:31 MST
(Read More... | 21702 bytes more | Score: 0)
Outlaw War
ArticlesMedia Monitors - September 14, 2005

“Will nations never devise a more rational umpire of differences than force? Are there no means of coercing injustice more gratifying to our nature than a waste of the blood of thousands and of the labor of millions of our fellow creatures?” ~Thomas Jefferson

America’s finest young women and men are being maimed and killed every day in Iraq in an illegal war intentionally started by our illegitimate president. Bush’s war crimes have victimized thousands of Americans, and he is extorting more than a billion dollars a week from us to finance his crime spree.

In just the last two years, Bush has spent almost six and a half billion dollars on thousands of projects in Iraq by the Corps of Engineers, while slashing millions from its budget to protect New Orleans. He has sent thousands of National Guard troops from Louisiana and Mississippi to fight his illegal war in Iraq, depriving those states of the emergency resources they needed to cope with Hurricane Katrina. His criminality and bungling stupidity directly caused the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans in those states.

What has Bush’s war accomplished? He has ordered the imprisonment of American citizens without trial or access to counsel, and he has established concentration camps where torture of prisoners is approved and condoned in violation of international law.

In Iraq, Bush has turned a hated dictator into a hero for millions in the Middle East, and the poor Iraqi victims, of whom more than 100,000 have been killed, increasingly resist our occupation. For every “insurrectionist” we kill there now, we create three “terrorists” who will threaten us here in the future.

A civil war between religious factions is shattering the national integrity of Iraq. The new central government is powerless, and its military and police have been infiltrated by local militias, who murder and imprison their opponents without fear of punishment.

The “insurrection” will continue to intensify; hundreds more flag-draped coffins will be secretly flown home in the middle of the night; thousands more of our youth will be maimed and emotionally crippled for life; Iraq will become an anti-democratic theocracy; we will lose the will to fight; and Bush will once again strut around claiming victory in the face of defeat.

Then, not only will the poor and oppressed people of Iraq continue to hate us with just cause, but we will have lost whatever respect and credibility we have left in the community of human civilization. This is stupid in the extreme!

This is not the first time we have engaged in a war that has proven to be a mistake, nor will it be the last unless we find a better way to defend ourselves against real or imagined threats to our national security.

Posted by administrator on Friday, September 16 @ 00:00:00 MST
(Read More... | 12031 bytes more | Score: 0)
THE MAN WHO ATE HIS FINGERS
Articles

THE MAN WHO ATE HIS FINGERS

A Story About the Stupidity of War and the Idiots Who Glorify It

Copyright © 2005—William John Cox

I can’t recall the first time I met Sam. I had seen him around the Times building for the past 15 years or so, and from time to time when he would see me on the street, he’d tell me one of my columns “was a good one.” Sam was homeless, but I had never seen him holding a sign or asking for handouts. His hair and beard may have gotten a little long and his clothes were well worn, but he had always been clean.

Sam frequented the loading dock around back and helped the crew throw the metropolitan edition on the trucks when the bundles came down the chute in the early morning. He used the dock restroom to clean up and to wash out a change of clothes each day, which he hung to dry in a back storeroom. Everyone liked Sam, including the dock boss, for unlike most street people he seemed to be without anger. There was, however, pain in his eyes and a limp when he walked.

He carried a backpack and often had a book in his hands as he shuffled along. A visit to the central library was a part of his daily routine, and he had his favorite overstuffed chair on the glass bridge high above the escalators. Sam read and dozed most mornings, as he watched the people come and go. In the afternoon, he could often be found surfing the Internet at the public computers on the second level.

Sam got his main meal each evening at the Rescue Mission and though thin, he wasn’t malnourished. He looked to be in his late 40s, and except for his impaired leg and trembling hands, seemed to be in good health.

I had little cause to think much about Sam until he left a phone message for me one morning a few weeks ago. When I called him back, he said he had purchased a disposable cell phone. He had a story to tell and he wanted to go off the record to discuss some conditions. Curious, I consented and he gave me the name and room number of a cheap hotel around the corner. I wasn’t on deadline; I didn’t have an idea for the next column, and I was a little worried about Sam, so I agreed to stop by that afternoon.

He had rented a small hotel room on the third floor for a month. The room was clean; a hot plate and mini refrigerator was in the corner; and a comfortable chair was by the window overlooking the street, with a table and a stack of books next to it.

I had brought along a couple of cold sodas, which we shared as Sam told me his story and related his plan. As a veteran of the first Gulf War he was gravely concerned for the troops currently fighting in Iraq, and he was determined to bring them home. I found Sam to be a thoughtful, well-read and articulate man as he explained why he had called.

Sam had graduated with top honors from high school in 1987, and his teachers had encouraged him to continue his education. However, as the only child of elderly parents, college seemed impossible. An army recruiter sold Sam on enlisting for four years, so he would be able to help out his parents and receive educational assistance when he got out. After boot camp the army sent him to Germany where he was trained as a tank driver. Sam liked his job; he didn’t have to march, and he to got operate a 60-ton, 1500-horsepower, Abrams main battle tank.

The young man had liked the German girls, enjoyed the food, and used his leaves to backpack around Western Europe touring the libraries and museums. He was saving money for college and looking forward to getting a degree, becoming a teacher, and traveling the world during summer vacations. Having been raised alone, Sam wanted to find the right girl, get married and have a large family. He was counting the days until his discharge.

At first, Sam said, he hadn’t paid much attention when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August 1990, but then his division was ordered to Saudi Arabia to participate in Operation Desert Storm. His unit led the assault on the left flank on February 24, 1991 and quickly penetrated the defense line. Wheeling about, his brigade executed a maneuver they had been practicing for months. Their tanks had been equipped with large bulldozer blades, and they were ordered to flank each side of the primitive trench system dug by the Iraqis in the sand and to plow it under.

“The Iraqi conscripts, mostly old men and boys, had been ordered into their positions at gunpoint and expected to quickly run away. They only had light weapons, and there was nothing to stop us. We never gave them a chance to surrender. I just drove along at about 25 miles an hour looking through my periscopes as we buried thousands of them alive. Armored combat earth movers came along behind us and smoothed away any evidence of what we had done. Altogether, we covered up about 70 miles of trenches.

“Later, I read that Cheney, who was secretary of defense at the time, said there was a gap in the law of war that had allowed us to deny quarter. I don’t know about that, but I have never been able to get that horrible image out of my mind. In my dreams, I keep running my tank up and down those trenches. Night after night, I keep hearing the men cry out to Allah and scream for their mothers, as tons of sand poured down on top of them, crushing the air from their lungs and slowly suffocating them to death.

“Maybe it was karma, or just plain bad luck, but a couple of weeks later we were stopped near a captured ammunition dump in Southern Iraq when the engineers blew up a large stock of rockets. We were downwind, and afterwards we all came down with what seemed like the flu. Later, we learned the rockets had contained sarin nerve gas. I was discharged a few months later, but my right leg had stopped working right and my hands had started to shake. The Army and the VA told me it had nothing to do with our exposure, but I wonder: Is this my punishment?“

Sam had become obsessed with the current Iraq War. Although the American body count is more than 1,875 and thousands more have been grievously wounded, he agonized most over the 30 percent of returning soldiers who suffer from mental illness. Sam imagined tens of thousands of them having the same kinds of nightmares that had kept him awake over the years. He had been thinking about what he could do to stop the war and to bring the troops home.

Sam had considered fasting, but decided no one would notice. He briefly thought about dousing himself with gasoline and self-immolating in Pershing Square, but concluded, while that might be noticed, few would care. Sam had a new idea, but he swore me to secrecy before he revealed it.

He had seen a photograph on an Internet site of an eight-year-old Iraqi boy named Ali, whose fingers had all been blown off when he picked up a brightly colored unexploded canister from a cluster bomb. Sam wondered how it would be to go through life without fingers, to be unable to write or to hold and read a book. As he thought about the boy and the pain he must have felt, Sam conceived what it was he could do to stop the war.

Posted by administrator on Friday, September 09 @ 01:14:01 MST
(Read More... | 43368 bytes more | Score: 0)
FROM OUTSIDE THE BOX: A REPORT ON THE HUMAN CONDITION
ArticlesMedia Monitors Network - July 5, 2005

      The genius of Albert Einstein was demonstrated by his ability to step aside in his mind and view the universe and its physical laws from a place where the rest of us had never ventured. In proving that time is relative he had to, as we say today, think outside the box. The world we live in is a troubling place. To better understand it, perhaps we can take a flight of fantasy and imagine that we are regularly visited by benevolent time travelers from another dimension whose sole mission is to identify the truth. What conclusions would these truth seekers draw about who we are, what we are doing to ourselves, and why? Freed from political lies and religious distortions, what would their report say?

Posted by administrator on Monday, July 04 @ 09:29:57 MST
(Read More... | 9297 bytes more | Score: 0)
: TWICE FOOLED – SHAME ON US: THE CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT
ArticlesThe Online Journal - June 25, 2005

      George W. Bush stole the 2000 election and we let him get away with it. While the Democrats cried because Al Gore had won the vote, the Republicans counted their loot and planned the next heist. Crime does pay when the Justices of the Supreme Court are in on the caper, and they can’t be impeached if the crooks control the Congress.

Posted by williamcox on Monday, June 20 @ 18:27:37 MST
(Read More... | 21845 bytes more | | Score: 0)
Voters Online

There are currently, 16 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

PROGRESS ON YOUTH EVOLT! SITE

The Voter’s peaceful political evolution continues to rapidly grow in popularity, worldwide, with more than 17,000 unique visitors to the Voters Evolt! site last month; however, from the beginning we’ve known that the Evolution will never take place unless it is compelled by the next generation of voters.

Work on the YouthEvolt.com flash site continues in an effort to develop the most interesting and effective youth protest site on the Internet.

In preparation, we’ve taken hundreds of photographs of young people at political events during the past year.

Here’s a preview of the splash page.

Here’s a slideshow of the March 15, 2008 anti-war march in Hollywood.

Here's a slideshow of the May Day 2008 march in Los Angeles.

Stay tuned for the launch. It’s gonna be spectacular!

FUTURE PLANNING

The Voters are also in the process of incorporating Evolt Inc. as a nonprofit corporation to underwrite the expansion of its peaceful nonpartisan political evolution. In furtherance of its plan, the voters have secured the domain names of WomenEvolt.com, WorkersEvolt.com, and SeniorEvolt.com.

As a preview, here's a slideshow of women protesting at the March 15, 2008 anti-war march in Hollywood.

A PEACEFUL POLITICAL EVOLUTION

" –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,… organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."~The Declaration of Independence

How many more lies must we listen to and how many more political scandals must we endure before we become sick enough to demand effective changes in our government? Have we suffered enough to force us through a political "evolution" to safeguard our freedoms in this country and to avoid committing war crimes against others?

In Washington’s Crossing, an excellent history of the near failure of the American Revolution in the winter of 1776, David Hackett Fischer concluded that it was not Washington’s leadership or the victories at Trenton and Princeton that saved the revolution following his resounding defeat in New York City. Rather, the victories resulted from the revival of spirit that arose among the ordinary people in the Delaware Valley as they began to read Thomas Paine’s American Crisis.

According to Fischer, "This great revival grew from defeat, not from victory. The awakening was a response to a disaster. Doctor Benjamin Rush, who had a major role in the event, believed that this was the way a free public would always work, and the American republic in particular. He thought it was a national habit of the American people (maybe all free people) not to deal with a difficult problem until it was nearly impossible."

Although we are calculating the cost in thousands of lives and billions of dollars, we cannot imagine the full extent of damage that will flow from our president’s having misled our nation into an illegal war with Iraq and our innocent troops into the commission of war crimes. We must pay attention to his threats and fear he will launch another “preemptive” war, dropping nuclear “bunker busters” on Iran just in time to save the fall Congressional elections for the Republicans.

Increasingly, we can perceive the extent of devastation to our economy, as our president throws away our hard-earned money, eliminates taxes for his wealthy friends, runs up debts for our children and grandchildren to pay in the future, tries to destroy our Social Security, encourages the shipment of American jobs out of the country, and allows the international value of our currency to depreciate.

All of us, liberals and conservatives, are going to be increasingly harmed by the failures of our government and those we’ve allegedly elected to run it. We must anticipate there are more lies on their lips waiting to be told, even more ugly secrets waiting to be uncovered and even worse scandals yet to unfold.

The good news is that the American people remain the best, the bravest, and the brightest our human civilization has ever produced. Americais the Promised Land – we are an amalgamation of all races and all cultures on Earth. We will survive and, ultimately, we will achieve a government that better cares for us and is less threatening to the rest of the world. The bad news is that we will have to go through hell to get there. So, how do we brave the flames?

A National Policy Referendum

Perhaps the most basic problem with our government today is that, irrespective of the party in power, it primarily responds to the demands of large corporations and moneyed special interest groups, rather than respecting the hopes and aspirations of ordinary workers and small businesses.

Every four years the two main political parties construct "platforms" to serve as publicity gimmicks to get their candidate elected. After the election, both parties generally ignore the policies they set forth in their platforms and begin to take care of themselves and their financial supporters, rather than to do what they said they were going to do for the rest of us. The process is supposed to result in policies that reflect the interests of the voters, but it is a scandal at best. At worst, it is a continuing political disaster.

Access by individuals to their elected officials is the foundation of a republican form of government. However, the election of our representatives is now more dependent upon massive expenditures of campaign contributions from their corporate sponsors, their wealthy friends, and well-funded, single-issue, special interest groups rather than upon a meaningful vote by an informed electorate.

Last year, special interest groups spent well over $2 billion just to lobby the federal government. While there are allegedly some limits on campaign contributions, there are no restraints on institutional schmoozing. The Tom De Lay - Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal, arrest of Bush’s procurement official, illegal contributions by Freddie Mac, and Congressman Cunningham’s bribery conviction represent just the tip of the iceberg.

No matter how deeply we ordinary citizens dig into our pockets, we cannot financially compete with the powerful special interests. No matter how well we organize, we cannot match the influence of the financial and political insiders. No matter how often we march and picket, they will always beat us through the side door into the corridors of power.

Not only are we are no longer represented; we have also been stripped of Constitutional protections we once enjoyed. Thoughtful people of every political persuasion are increasingly alarmed about the reductions in freedom we have passively accepted in response to 9/11. Many of us, irrespective of party or political beliefs, now question whether the Bill of Rights will survive another terrorist attack, which is sure to come.

Since we have been abandoned by our government, we must collectively focus upon a peaceful method to modify our government to one which more attentively considers the needs and protection of all voters, whether Republican, Democrat, Reform, Libertarian, Green or Independent. An intolerant, non-responsive and repressive government cannot endure. The choice is whether political change results from a violent revolution or a peaceful evolution, from a revolt or an evolt.

One way we can regain control over our government is to require it to hold a National Policy Referendum every four years when we vote for our president. Such a referendum would not make law; rather the purpose would be to express the collective policy of the people through their answers to the major political questions that should most concern the new administration and Congress during their terms of office.

Individuals and organizations could nominate policy questions; Congress would have to debate the issues in formulating 12 current policy questions to be listed on a national ballot; and the president would have to either sign or veto the bill.

To ensure passage of the policy bill, perhaps the pay of all members of Congress and the president and all members of their senior staffs should be withheld commencing on the New Year’s Day of each presidential election year until the issues are identified. Or, maybe all national political campaign contributions to parties and candidates should be prohibited until the bill is passed and signed.

Once the questions are promulgated, presidential candidates (and other elected representatives) would be forced to take positions on a wide variety of real issues. Politics has been defined as the art of not telling the truth, and politicians quickly learn to avoid telling the truth at all cost. Because there are special interests on every side of an issue, it is impossible to please everyone, yet the politicians strive onward, lying and denying, twisting and hiding, trying to grab every vote. The best theater can be seen during the presidential debates. Trying to get a straight answer from any of the candidates is like trying to nail spit to a wall.

Most importantly, we the voters would be more likely to study and question the issues and to arrive at our own opinions, rather than to have them spoon fed to us by AM talk radio, Fox News, and the corporate-controlled op-ed pages.

Not only must we increasingly talk about the issues over the back fence or in the break room, we must also insist that the Fairness Doctrine eliminated by the Reagan-appointed Federal Communication Commission be resurrected to allow fair comment and competing points of view by ordinary voters to be aired for all to hear.

Instead of responding emotionally to brief television and radio ads, most of which are designed to evoke a negative reaction, we would be far more likely to thoughtfully consider positive information and political analysis.

A number of countries, including Canada, Sweden and Switzerland refer policy matters to their voters for binding decisions, and the European Union resulted from a referendum in the participating countries. During its 2004 presidential election, Taiwan submitted two policy questions regarding its relations with China to voters. However, no nation presently holds a non-binding policy referendum as a matter of course.

There are those who might argue that our presidential election is a referendum on the candidates’ platforms; however, the winner-take-all results do not, in any way, suggest our level of support for any of the competing issues. The outcome turns far too often on which of the candidates makes the fewest mistakes or which has devised the most effective smear campaign.

A National Policy Referendum will not be a national opinion poll. The very process of articulating the political questions, the more lively debate, and our thoughtful vote will validate the results far beyond that attainable by any random sampling, no matter how scientific. We will not be expressing a snap opinion. Nor, will we be making law. We will make policy!

Our right to vote in a National Policy Referendum can be found in the First Amendment to the Constitution, which expressly provides our right to petition our government for redress. Our right to peaceably assemble and to seek redress was intended as the bedrock of our free society and as a safety valve to avoid violent revolution.

In a free society, we have a duty to avoid the use of force, even if we believe our existence under ineffectual government is being seriously threatened. It is also our duty to peacefully petition our government, before we resort to violence.

If we are to effectively modify our government through a peaceful political evolution, we must be allowed to exercise our vote in a National Policy Referendum. Otherwise, what can we do?

A Peaceful Write-In Protest

As effective as a national referendum may be to establish government policy, little good will come of it unless those we elect are forced to pay attention to our interests and to actually carry out our policies. As it is, presidential candidates say one thing and do another to the extent they believe they can get away with it, and because of party politics, we keep getting stuck with having to decide upon the lesser of two evils.

Imagine if we combined a National Policy Referendum with a grass-roots rebellion in which a majority of us were to actually write in the name of the person we wanted to preside over our government. Wouldn’t we seize the power that legitimately belongs to the citizens of this country and wouldn’t we evolve a far more effective and representative government?

Can we trust the current method by which we elect our president? Are there good reasons why we should rebel against the present system?

In 2000, more than a half million voters selected Al Gore, the Democratic candidate, over George Bush, the Republican candidate. However, Bush prevailed in the Electoral College because a fraudulent election in Florida gave him that state’s 20 electoral votes, even though the candidates were only separated by a few hundred votes. Bush had an edge and the fix was in. His brother, Jeb, was governor and the Secretary of State chaired his reelection committee.

Not only were thousands of eligible (mostly Democratic) Florida voters disenfranchised before the election, but every effort to manually recount the ballots, including thousands of rejected votes, was blocked by the Secretary of State. A phony riot was staged by Republican Party operatives flown in from out of state to intimidate local election supervisors, and five Republican-appointed members of the U.S. Supreme Court contrived a politically-motivated decision that reversed a far more reasoned opinion by Florida’s high court, which had ordered that every voter’s intention be determined as accurately as possible.

Following the election, Congress passed the $3 billion Help American Vote Act, which encouraged the States to purchase secret computerized voting systems manufactured and maintained by companies whose officers uniformly support the Republican Party. Walden W. O’Dell is the chief executive of one of those companies, Diebold Inc. In August 2003, he sent a letter to 100 wealthy friends inviting them to a Republican Party fund-raiser at his home in Columbus, Ohio. He said, "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." It appears that he did.

Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the purchasers of electronic voting systems (states and local governments) are not allowed access to any information on how voting results are recorded, nor is there any requirement that the machines provide a paper trail for recounts. All of which is a recipe for fraud.

The 2004 election differed from 2000 in that George Bush may have received a higher percentage of the popular vote; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that he should have lost in the Electoral College, except for another fraudulent election, this time in (no surprise) Ohio.

The Ohio Secretary of State, Kenneth Blackwell, served as the chairman of Bush’s Ohio reelection campaign and publicly called Senator Kerry, the Democratic candidate, a "disaster" sure to reap "terrible" and "horrible" results if elected. Not only did Blackwell cause the registrations of Democratic voters to be rejected because they were on the wrong weight of paper, there were too few voting machines allocated to poor (and largely Democratic) precincts.

When combined with a Republican Party program of aggressively issuing personal challenges to voters and the casting of provisional ballots, the vote suppression tactics led to long lines and waits of up to seven hours to vote, primarily in poor neighborhoods. Many people finally gave up and lost their right to vote.

Exit polls across the nation appeared to give Kerry an advantage in the popular vote, up to three percent in the swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. Even before the votes were counted, Blackwell was bragging that he had helped "deliver" Ohio in announcing Bush’s "victory." In just these three states, the odds of the dramatic swing between the exit polls and the final tabulation have been calculated as 250 million to one!

A "computer error" allegedly created thousands of non-existent Bush voters in Ohio, and one lawsuit claimed that official rolls in Ohio’s most populous county omitted 170,000 registered voters. It is significant that Bush carried Ohio by less than 119,000 votes in an election where more than 90,000 ballots were discarded because they failed to indicate a valid choice for president and more than 23 percent of all provisional ballots were rejected.

Interestingly, the statewide hand count of "acceptable" provisional ballots and absentee ballots (after Blackwell had already declared victory) provided Kerry with 54.46 percent of the vote. In several heavily Republican precincts, Blackwell certified election results showing more votes than registered voters, up to 124 percent more!

Attempts to conduct a recount in Ohio’s election were frustrated by Blackwell’s personal (rather than random) designation of the precincts to be recounted and by earlier visits to many of those same precincts by technicians of the voting machine companies who tampered with the machines to ensure that the machine results matched the precinct’s reported tally.

During the joint session of Congress on January 6, 2005 to certify the electoral vote, only one dozen Democratic House members and one Democratic senator stood up to complain about the voting irregularities in Ohio. However, their objections did force a debate about Electoral College results for only the second time since 1877. After a two-hour session, the Senate voted 74-1 and the House voted 267-31 to reject the protest. Can it be said that either party truly had the interests of the voters at heart?

Our democratic republic is founded upon our ability to trust the results of our collective vote. Is there any doubt that the advent of black-box voting, systematic election fraud, and the widespread intimidation of voters dictate that we capture control of the election process before the chance is lost forever?

Each of us must find within ourselves the individual courage and initiative to perform one simple rebellious act – refuse to use the computerized voting machines or any other machine ballot.

Instead of responding like laboratory animals pushing a button in response to the stimulus of the latest ten-second television smear ad, we can each take a little longer to carefully consider the candidates presented on the ballot by the various political parties. Once we decide, we can demonstrate our literacy and our power by clearly writing in our personal choice for president of the United States, whether or not his or her name is on the ballot!

Presently, half of all voters don’t bother to go to the polls and less than one quarter actually elect the president for all of us. Imagine the immense power that would flow to the people if voting truly became universal.

If the voter turnout was to dramatically increase, and if only 15 to 25 percent of us were to write in our vote, trust that the politicians will be scrambling to ensure that all write-in votes cast for them are legally counted. We would quickly find them registering their willingness to accept every write-in vote naming them for any office of public trust.

Conclusion

If we simple voters are smart enough to earn a living and to figure out how to pay our taxes, if we have courage enough to fight the wars started by our government, we are also entitled to collectively establish basic policy to guide our government, and to personally write in the name of whomever we consider most qualified to effectuate our policies.

We , the ordinary voters of every party, must evolt against politics as usual and join in a nonviolent evolution to transform our government. We must peacefully evolve our system of government to require a national ballot for president every four years which presents the 12 most important national policy questions and which lists the candidates nominated by the major political parties.

All paid political advertising should be prohibited during the week before the election, and we should all enjoy a four-day paid holiday weekend to celebrate the most sacred sacrament of our national political religion. No voter should ever be turned away from the polls, and every vote must be hand counted.

We should go to our polling place and thoughtfully answer the policy questions presented on the ballot. Then, we should carefully write in the name of the person we select to implement our policy. It could take a week or two to patiently hand count (or recount) the ballots. So what! The results will be felt far beyond two weeks. We will decide who is in charge of this country and we will chart the direction of its future. We are The Voters!

Our genetic pool is the most robust and diverse of any society on earth, and the revolutionary spirit continues to run deep and true in the blood lines of all of us who yearn for freedom and the full fruits of our labor.

Let us unite together to show the world what we are really all about and what we can peacefully accomplish together. Let us again demonstrate a new system of government that will better serve to provide freedom, justice and prosperity to all who share this fragile planet.

Febuary 21 , 2007

The Last Generation of Mindkind on Earth

The following essay was written many years ago and, although a little lengthy for the Internet, it is posted here for those who like to mix a little philosophy with their politics.

Should the citizens of the United States engage in a peaceful political rebellion to avoid economic disaster and future wars founded, not upon wishful thinking and hopeful denial, but on a simple and specific agenda for effective collective action?

Is not the desire for freedom a universal trait of all sentient beings? Otherwise inequality of opportunity forever retards the intellectual evolution of their species.

Discussion: Once the melody of freedom's song is raised in democratic harmony, it echoes throughout the heavens for all to hear, as there is but peace in all of the universe, and it has been that way for all of eternity. No being, truly thinking, makes war instead of exploring the stars, for without peace, no being can fly far from their birth planet. They can only foul their nest and peck their siblings to death, thinking conditions beyond their nest are the same as surround them, never knowing that there's no Star Wars, except in the blind fantasies of those who never learn to see.

Danger. If there is but peace in all the universe and it has been that way for all of eternity, what then must we do to have any voice in our fate? Are we to continue living in fear of atomic-tipped missiles in the former USSR? Is there a more real danger that one day some small dispute ignites a financial war and China dumps its dollars or OPEC begins to trade its oil in Euros? Or, what if some other tiny economic turmoil twists the stock, bond, currency, and real estate markets into a chaotic contractual tailspin, and for whatever reason, in a single day, paper and electronic money simply cease to have economic relevance and virtually all legal wealth is eliminated? Then, only gold and other metals will have any real value; not silicon, plastic, or credit ratings.

Quick. Then, when there's no gasoline for sale, nor cabs to call, my spare change will be worth more than your former millions, and my bicycle will get me farther than your BMW. Without electricity and wave transmissions, your telephone, computers, televisions, DVDs and stereos are worth less than my knife. If all houses are for sale and all apartments are for rent, all titles are worthless, and all property is available for the taking. If everybody is looking for work, nobody will be hiring. If everything worth stealing has been stolen, you will find nothing to eat, no matter the caliber of your gun, or the number of your last few bullets.

Much like the Earth being struck by a giant asteroid, perhaps one-third, half, or even three-quarters of us, billions all over the world, could all be dead in a matter of months. No possessions, no livestock, no grain, no fruit, no game, nothing: Nothing to eat but the flesh of our own kind, starting with the babies, who will be the first to die.

Dirty. Will it be a blessing if the troubles are prolonged? Unless something is done, unless we, together, take positive action, things will steadily get worse instead of better. Negatives will multiple negatives, violent crime will continue to increase, and the social ills which compel the forgotten to riot will remain uncured.

Fires, floods, earthquakes, and other disasters will not cease to occur, but our governments will cease to do anything to help anyone. At first, as now, our governments will cut to the "basics," and finally will do nothing but collect taxes, sacrifice our youth fighting local warlords, and impose the death penalty for all crimes, either immediately or through forced labor.

Lost Knowledge. The downward spiral may be less steep but just as deadly, for we will soon lose the collective genius of the last two or three generations of accumulated race knowledge. As we gather here together at the threshold of galactic awareness, we stand to lose all we've learned and conceived of in just the last century. Once the last skulls that once contained our vast database of information and experience are laid in the ground – at that moment, the flame of our collective intellect will flicker and die.

When the daily quest for food leaves no time in the day to teach the little children to read, the last surviving texts will be of small value except to start a fire. And, at that precise moment, when the last of us who can read these words and comprehend their meaning, sleep our last dream, we, who once shared these thoughts, will cease to be; our words will be silenced and our learning lost, and our tears and toil will have been for nought.

The Last Generation. Along with our concrete castings, twisted girders, ancient carvings in stone and other megalithic artifacts, eons from now, a few scraps of our language may be found to identify us as the last generation of one of Gaia's children, an aquatic primate, known as human, who once climbed out of the lakes, through the trees and along the rivers, sailed in boats and settled distant shores and waterways around the world, harnessed the atom and flew to the Moon.

There the story will end, and across the universal field of mind and along the eternal corridors of time it will be whispered of how the human infant's first few breaths in the breeze of wisdom were smothered by the wasting virus of deception, hatred, and war. Of how it lay struggling in its earthly crib, looking up with fevered eyes through the cosmic window, fighting with all the strength of its existence, fortified by the antibiotics of knowledge, and its healing properties of wisdom, yet still too weak to see. Nothing more can be said, for we were stillborn.

Song of Mindkind. Or, celestial history may record that we, the last generation of the second millennia following the time of Jesus, fifteen centuries after the teachings of Muhammad, were the last generation to suffer war and who survived birth as Children of Mindkind on Earth. Then, songs will be sung and stories told of our joining minds in a powerful signal of freedom, of the moment our souls sensed the secret and soared with the Spirit of Wisdom to vibrate the waves of eternity with the melody of our children's voices, so they may be forever heard to harmonize in the Universal Choir of Peace.

Reality of Now. As glorious as that image may be, now is now, and let's face it folks; things are bad and the future is looking worse. So, what can we do?

Read More

 
Copyright © 2004. William John Cox. All rights reserved